
Ship apps without creeping on your users. Never see their data again
Stoffel lets you build privacy-first apps. Focus on growing your product, not handling toxic user data.
Don’t let privacy fears hold your apps’s growth hostage
Status Quo Privacy is killing your velocity. Stoffel separates your logic from raw toxic data
Status Quo
1
At Rest: Encrypt data on the user’s device
2
In Transit: Encrypt it while it moves to your server.
3
Decrypt it to process logic in memory
(Your app just touched toxic data)
4
Your app is a breach magnet.
Stoffel Quo
1
At Rest: Encrypt data on the user’s device
2
In Transit: Encrypt it while it moves to your server.
3
Keep it encrypted while computing.
(Your logic runs on blind inputs)
4
Zero toxic data exposure.
Just build apps. Skip the toxic data
Your users don't want another privacy policy. They want mathematical guarantees their data can't leak.
Compute the Result
StoffelVM runs on encrypted inputs. Nobody sees the raw data. Not you. Not us.

Features you didn't think could be private
Complex Features that run entirely on encrypted data

AI/ML
Federated learning aggregation
Train better models without centralizing sensitive data. Compute global weight updates while raw gradients stay distributed.
Key Management
Distributed Key Generation
Generate private keys across your company, or partners without a single point of failure.
No liability bomb ticking in your S3 bucket.

FAQ
Have more questions? Contact our team with any questions you may have.
Can't we just anonymize the data?
You already know the answer to this. The moment you join datasets—or someone subpoenas your logs—'anonymized' becomes 're-identifiable.' Anonymization is statistical hope, not cryptographic proof.
Won't this slow us down?
Compared to what? The three-month security review you're avoiding right now? The slowest part of building privacy-sensitive features is the meetings where you argue about whether you should.
Isn't this massive overkill for our use case?
Depends. Do you prefer 'Yes, but we promise to protect it' or 'No, our architecture makes storing toxic data impossible'?
This sounds like research-lab complexity
That's what we thought too. Then we actually tried it. Stoffel is production-ready infrastructure, not an academic prototype. You write logic in a domain-specific language that feels like defining a function signature. The MPC stuff happens under the hood. You ship like a normal developer.
What's the catch?
Performance overhead for encrypted computation (we're transparent about benchmarks). Learning curve for Stoffel-Lang (not Python, but not assembly either). And you have to actually care about privacy—if you just want legal cover, this isn't it.